A Book Review of Mathematics of Life: Unlocking the secrets of existence by Ian Stewart
I know that many of you have heard mash-up songs already and
many likes that kind of style. I personally like the mash-ups of Daniel Kim or famously know for 'Pop Danthology' because he put all the top pop songs of each year together and the way he mixes
those songs is awesome. This book by Ian Stewart is somehow that way, he is
sort of the DJ and Mathematics and Biology are the’ songs’ he tries to mash-up.
Yes, it is pretty daunting to just even see those two disciplines together but
somehow they are better together (Jack Johnson fan here) and one of the most
intriguing and exciting interdisciplinary fields, I am not surprised that it is
a thing today. Studying interdisciplinary fields take research and those
different disciplines to a whole new level making the impossible possible.
In Biology, the world changing innovations are the microscope,
Linnaean classification, evolution and natural selection, genetics, and DNA but
the Author proposes that Mathematics should be included because Biology has
benefitted a lot from Mathematics with tools such as logical reasoning, axioms,
and abstractions. After that, the Author introduces to the nitty-gritty of taxonomy,
evolution, allopatric and sympatric speciation, DNA, genomes, genetics,
epidemiology, viruses, gait, eukaryotes and prokaryotes, networking, pattern
formation and axons then concluded that in order that mathematics will be more
appealing to biologists, it needs more than just a ‘numerical coincidence’ and
explained more about this by giving an example. He asked why biochemistry and
mechanics generates, for example, petal patterns after the Fibonacci sequence
and this is where mathematics comes into play.
Inspired by Alan Turing’s paper, The Chemical Basis of Morphogenesis, various biomathematicians based
their specific model and biological theory of pattern-formation after that. But
the author stated, “turns out to be too simple to explain many details of
animal markings, but it captures many important features in a simple context,
and points the way to models that are biologically realistic.” Turing’s ideas
were extended by some people and the author noted one man who is James Murray
and he proved a theorem based on Turing’s idea stating this: “A spotted animal
can have a striped tail, but a striped animal cannot have a spotted tail. Intuitively,
this is because the smaller diameter of the tail leaves less room for stripes
to become unstable, whereas this instability is more likely on the larger-diameter
body.”
After this chapter, the Algorithmic Game Theory makes its
debut then the author brings the topic to a guy named Barry Siverno who studies
the Uta stansburiana or side-botched
lizards and there are three morphs of this type of lizard which are orange throated,
blue-throated, and yellow-throated which suggests an evolutionary game where
orange beats blue, yellow beats orange, and blue beats yellow. Then the author
discusses the concept survival of the fittest in a way which there is no one
sure winner and he discussed that if two species arise from one original
animal, they can exploit the environment greatly rather than they are just one
kind of species. And I quote from the author, “. A changing environment can
change the balance of these forces, with dramatic results.” referring to the
gene flow force and the natural selection force.
Turning or Turing? Spare me this time if I'm fun of searching mistakes. The review takes all the positive comments to the author as well as the book. Para maiba lng. Hanap2 ng mali. Hehehe. Don't get me wong ha. Btw, ur review is good.
ReplyDeleteBig shout out to Queenie from sparing me from further embarrassment. will be editing this asap! LOL
DeleteLabyu LJ. Heheheh ^_^
Delete