To every great discovery, there's always an amazing
behind-the-scenes that paved way to the revelation of a new idea. Example, for
a movie to become a blockbuster hit, the story should captivate the attention
of the viewers, of course, with the guidance and efforts made by the editors,
scriptwriters, director, actors and the like. The Mathematics of Life covered
all that, showing how Mathematics contributed to the advancement of the
concepts and information (like genetics, DNA and evolution) that made biology
one of the most studied field, and how the information we gathered from these
concepts became helpful in understanding the physical and biological phenomena
and patterns occurring in human and other forms of life.
As I opened the PDF file of the book "The
Mathematics of Life" written by Ian Stewart, the first image that I saw
were numbers, in different sizes and positions, forming an elephant, clearly
denoting that there could be a potential relationship between Math and Biology.
What that relationship could be was the question answered by Stewart in his
book.
First thing that I quickly
observed on the book was how Stewart carefully elaborated and explained that
mathematics is not just applied to concepts involving power, inertia, gravity
or concepts denoting physical characteristics of things. He clarified that
mathematics is not just used to explain a certain event quantitatively and even
pointed out that a science concept with no quantitative data does not imply
that math was not used in the whole process of gathering the evidences.
Unifying, the book imposed one thing: to unfold the
role of mathematics in rebuilding and re-establishing the concepts of biology.
First, he tackled the history of the discovery of the first five revolutions in
biology: the microscope, classification, evolution, genetics and DNA. He
exposed some highlights on how each revolution was discovered and how it became
important to the discovery of a new idea. Then, he revealed the sixth
revolution in biology which was mostly misunderstood for its features that are
complicated, highly designed for critical minds and slightly confusing.
Mathematics. Mathematics was given a recognition it did not deserved. While
most people think of mathematics as a subject full of numbers, mathematicians
always claimed the fact that math is composed of a greater scope including
logic, statistics, process or symmetry needed in the field of biology.
Mathematics and biology worked hand-in-hand in order
to expose the structures, patterns, and shapes of the molecular objects we see
in the microscope as well as the motion or movement of the organelles found
inside the body. These two fields showed the characteristics of objects that
are viewed using the biological apparatuses and are interpreted through the use
of mathematical models for easier understanding. What really got me was the
fact that mathematics was used in order to interpret the patterns or designs we
see in a shell, in a zebra, in a boxfish or anything having spots and stripes.
Who would have thought these patterns need linear or a more complex equation to
identify if it would form a regular or irregular pattern?
Moreover, the book gave me insights on petal
formation of flowers as well as the gestation of animals. "How many petals
could a flower presumably have?" or "How many foals could there be
when all horses gave birth?" became more interesting topics for me.
The book discussed so much about biology and forms of
life that it arose to my interest in analyzing the forms of life and restudying
the concepts that I have learned in the past like nucleic acids, sequencing,
phylogenetic tree, amino acids, proteins, the brain and even Charles Darwin's
famous finches.
As I was reading the book, I observed that there were
some parts that were slightly confusing because the terminologies used were
overly smart. I had a hard time relating myself as a student to what he tries
to explain especially on the last part since some of the concepts are not well
explained and was difficult to understand. But overall, I found the book very,
very interesting. I discovered so much about biology with the the help of
mathematics that I never learned in just plain biology lectures. I became aware
of the presence and importance of mathematics in characterizing the patterns,
structures and formations we see in the biological world.
The book gave us a very scientific and mathematical
outlook of everything around us. With this book, I can really say that
mathematics and biology or Biomathematics can be a great combination that would
give real justification to the real world of biology and all fields of science.
I agree with u. ( char!), Indeed I am. But the book was like circled on the relation of math with bio but don't really establish bio as undergone mathematical revolution. Well, we are bounded by modern math today and the book was into linear algbra, patterns and the basics only, If it does go into deep math, it loses its way already.
ReplyDeleteThe book did give us another perspective to look at math. It basically gives mathematics a new perspective - a biological approach. Through this book, we can see that math has a face that is close to biology, and though these two may be on the opposing ends of a pole, they can collaborate for greater achievements.
ReplyDeleteI agree that some terminologies were difficult to understand but the totally of the book is still interesting and it is much comprehensible compared to the first book review.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, the ideas and concepts of mathematics applied to biology could really combine to make new revolution that could change the way how we think about biology.
ReplyDelete