A Book Review to What is Mathematics, Really? by Reuben Hersh
What is mathematics? A common
misconception is that mathematics is the study of numbers and figures. Through
time mathematics consist of arithmetics and concerned with geometry. Later on,
mathematics become the science of patterns in that way it finds a pattern for
everything to figure out generalizations. Now, it is renowned that mathemathics
is a universal language because it has elements such as symbols and logic to
communicate in the universe. But how is mathematics should be understand?
Mathematicians and philosophers of mathematics treat
mathematics as isolated, timeless, ahistorical and inhuman. The part one
including first five chapters of this book is programmatic, the preceding
chapters contained in the part two were historical and the last chapter is the
summary. Hersh, in his book comes to repudiate the traditional philosophy of
mathematics which is notably the Platonism and Formalism. Platonism is realism;
it said that mathematical objects are real and independent of our knowledge. The basic idea is
that mathematical entities exist outside space and time, outside thought and
matter, in an abstract realm. There are two kinds of Platonism: Platonism of
mathematicians which is an empirical scientist, cannot invent only discover
because things are already there. And Platonism of philosophers uses logicism.
Formalist philosophy of mathematics: “Mathematics is a meaningless game.” He
rejected formalism because for him mathematics is not a rule governed game,
rules are not arbitrary rather are historically determined by the working
societies. On the contrary he showed that from the viewpoint of philosophy,
mathematics must be understood as a human activity, a social phenomenon, part
of human culture, historically evolved, and intelligible only in a social
context. He called this approach as the Humanist viewpoint. Mathematical
objects are created by humans, not arbitrarily, but from activity with existing
mathematical objects, and from the needs of science and daily life. Humanism is
a human activity, a product and characteristic of human culture and society. In
the humanist philosophy, mathematics is a human activity carried by the society
and developing historically. He showed off how the humanist idea of nature of
mathematics resembles the mathematics applied to work today. The philosophy of
mathematics was said to be a social conceptualism or social-cultural- historic
or social-historic-philosophy. Social constructivism views mathematics as a
social construction. It is drawn to conventionalism
in accepting that human language; rules and agreement play a key role in
establishing and justifying the truths of mathematics. The
philosophy of mathematics says that mathematics has methods; these are the
conjecture and proof. Mathematical discovery rests on proofs and later on
becomes theories. A theory is a network of concepts, properties, connections
and facts. But Neo-Fregeanism says that theory is the only part of mathematics
that deserves philosophical consideration.
Mathematics has a problem and a solution. In this book
the title itself imposes a question that should be answered within the context.
Reuben Hersh contradicted the two principal views of the nature of mathematics
which are the Platonism and Formalism; that was mostly believed by
philosophers. He made a philosophical idea to address mathematics which he
called Humanism. Humanist philosophy links mathematics with people, society and
history. Even if I really got a difficulty of understanding the book having no
background of philosophy in mathematics, I think the idea of Humanism is
factual. Mathematics has been discovered by the early civilization within their
society because they face problems to be answered. Mathematics would always be
part of human culture and history for some of the inventions that led to
mathematical progress where rooted to the culture of the place it was
discovered. An example is the discovery of number zero in India; it was
influenced by their religion. And without the history, all those mathematical
discoveries would be buried several feet under the ground without being used
and developed by the great mathematicians in this century. The main purpose of
this book is to answer in what sense do mathematical object exists and to
elucidate the mysteries behind the meaning and nature of mathematics.
I also agree with your insights about the given topic. However, the whole plot of your ideas were not that established that not all readers could comprehend the gist of the whole review. I suggest that you extract only the most important information instead of putting loads of information that is not that necessary.
ReplyDeleteThe book that was reviewed was really complicated. And by this reason, its book review must be easy to comprehend in order for the readers to relate with what the author wants to imply.
ReplyDeleteYou're certainly right about the context of this book but it was very difficult to absorb because I cannot fully understand the philosophy behind mathematics.
ReplyDelete